// THE WORKFLOW ASSESSMENT
One week. One workflow. Proof of what AI would cost you — €4,000, fully credited if you continue.
Before you commit to a platform, a model, or a hire: we take one workflow your team does by hand, run it across 15+ AI models, and hand you a report — what it would cost against the staff time it takes you today, which model is good enough, and what must stay human.
1 workflow
Fully measured, end to end
$0
Platform commitment required
5 days
Kickoff to written report
"Unlimited users — your approvers, auditors, and reviewers are free. You pay for the work agents actually do."
That's how everything we deploy is priced. No per-seat licenses, no charge for the people who check the work.
// what you get
A report with numbers, not adjectives
Sample pages from a delivered assessment. Client data redacted — the structure is exactly what you'll receive.
The routing table
| Task type | Model | $/1k |
|---|---|---|
| small | 3.20 | |
| mid-tier | 7.10 | |
| mid-tier | 6.50 | |
| nano | 0.80 |
Every step in your workflow, mapped to the cheapest model that holds quality — with the method noted per row.
The cost/quality frontier
Every model we tested, plotted by measured quality against cost per 1,000 tasks. The circled point is the model that's good enough.
The cost summary
−77%
What the workflow would cost run by AI, against the staff hours it takes you by hand today.
// run your numbers
What would one workflow cost by AI?
What's your baseline?
- Manual cost today
- $6,400/mo
- Routed pick: small (quality 91)
- $4.80/mo
- Human review (15% of tasks)
- $960/mo
- Estimated saving
- $5,435/mo
Quality bar for claims-status summarization: 90. The routed pick is the cheapest model that clears it in our benchmark.
These are estimates from our benchmark data. The assessment gives you your numbers.
Book the assessmentNo procurement needed
€4,000, fixed fee, one week. Sized for a discretionary budget — no RFP, no committee, no platform contract.
Runs on SectorFlow One
Every assessment runs on the same governed platform we deploy for clients — so the assessment doubles as a working product demo.
Credited toward what's next
Continue to a deeper Assessment or the Build and the full €4,000 comes off the price. Stop after the assessment and you keep the report. Either way, you got the numbers.
Already running AI? See the Routing Assessment
// questions
Asked before every assessment
We don't use AI at all yet. Is an assessment premature?
No — it's the cheapest possible first step. Instead of committing to a platform or a pilot, you get proof on one real workflow: what it would cost, which model is good enough, and which parts must stay with your team. You decide what to do next from evidence, not a vendor pitch.
How do you measure what the workflow costs us today?
We baseline it on staff time — minutes per task, your loaded hourly rate, and monthly volume — so the comparison is against what the work actually costs you by hand, not against someone else's AI bill.
What do you need from us?
One workflow your team does by hand, 20–50 redacted samples of its inputs and outputs, and a one-hour kickoff call. No AI infrastructure, no API keys, no IT project.
What if the assessment says AI isn't worth it for this workflow?
Then the report says so, with the numbers that prove it — and you just avoided a five-figure pilot that would have found out the slow way. The report is yours either way.
Is our data safe?
We work from redacted samples, sign an NDA on request, and run everything on SectorFlow One — with audit logs, approval workflows, and tool-permission scoping built in. The same governance posture we'd deploy for you.
What does the €4,000 buy, exactly?
A written report: the routing table for your workflow, a cost/quality chart across 15+ models, a savings estimate against your current manual cost, and a human-in-the-loop map. Fully credited toward a deeper Assessment or the Build if you continue.
// book the assessment
Pick a kickoff slot
One hour to scope the workflow. Written report back within five business days. €4,000, fully credited toward a deeper Assessment or the Build.